Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add support for the Stardict format as output format #11

Closed
humenda opened this issue Oct 18, 2016 · 7 comments
Closed

add support for the Stardict format as output format #11

humenda opened this issue Oct 18, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@humenda
Copy link
Member

humenda commented Oct 18, 2016

Stardict is a widely used format and is hence worth supporting. There's also a
mobile client QDict available which understands this format. Since we don't have a client, it'd be great to make our dictionaries available this way.

@bansp
Copy link
Member

bansp commented Oct 18, 2016

Not a bad idea. Have they published their schema and documentation?
I recall investigating one such case across user forums, with zero effect. But I can't recall now if it was StarDict or some other platform. :-)

@humenda
Copy link
Member Author

humenda commented Oct 18, 2016

Is the stardict not the same across the platforms? I won't be able to have a
look ATM, but I'm sure that it's possible to figure out how this format works.

There are enough open source implementations available.

Web: http://www.crustulus.de (English|Deutsch) | Blog: http://www.crustulus.de/blog
FreeDict: Free multilingual dictionaries - http://www.freedict.org
Freies Latein-Deutsch-Wörterbuch: http://www.crustulus.de/freedict.de.html

@humenda
Copy link
Member Author

humenda commented Oct 22, 2016

The XDXF project seems to have an easy method to support Stardict with the dictd format as intermediate:

"to convert from dictd format to stardict: makedict -o stardict file.index"

@bansp
Copy link
Member

bansp commented Oct 22, 2016

Let's fork it, then, if it's forkable. I can imagine that it may need tweaking on both sides.

@humenda
Copy link
Member Author

humenda commented Oct 31, 2016

I wouldn't fork it, rather work with them, wherever possible. I'll talk to them at some point.

@bansp
Copy link
Member

bansp commented Oct 31, 2016

I meant being able to adjust the code to match our potential modifications, and then pushing into their master. And well, yes, publishing from our own repo, just to make sure that these changes are in. But it's just thinking aloud.

@karlb
Copy link
Member

karlb commented Nov 24, 2017

Moved to freedict/tools#5.

@karlb karlb closed this as completed Nov 24, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants