-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Flexibility to add extra slot #134
Comments
@mab658 you could store this in the |
I'd asked Moshood to post this here earlier. I probably won't act on in soon, but it is something I want to keep here as a potential future enhancement. I'm currently shoving everything through the EBV slot even if it isn't really and EBV. This expansion may also consider covering complex traits that are a function of multiple traits. |
I hear you @gaynorr! I have been wondering the same myself! The question becomes what are all the slots we want/need! gv (current slot) & egv (not a slot currently) bv (not a slot currently and depends on the pop anyway) & ebv (current slot) dd and aa as above for the bv index trait? Should we have an option to define a trait that is a function of other traits and always comes at the end of the traits (say gv[, nTraits+1]) and we define such a mapping in the SP function? Or the finalisePop() function? |
Recent change in the |
In the course of simulation, one may simulate genetic estimated total genetic value (GETGV) in addition to EBV. It is advisable to allow the user to be able to add extra slot so that such effect could be added to the population object.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: