You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found the cam params (scale tx, ty) converge worse with or without the cam loss, and i use weak perspective in my code, in which kpy_2d = scale(kyp3d[, :2]) + txy. I think the key reason is the focal length of the freihand dataset is different with each image, and it range from 400 mm to 800 mm. So does the scale (focal / global_z) differs with each image.
So maybe the network cannot regress the scale well?
I want to how to make cam params converget better? is there any tricks in training? thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I found the cam params (scale tx, ty) converge worse with or without the cam loss, and i use weak perspective in my code, in which kpy_2d = scale(kyp3d[, :2]) + txy. I think the key reason is the focal length of the freihand dataset is different with each image, and it range from 400 mm to 800 mm. So does the scale (focal / global_z) differs with each image.
So maybe the network cannot regress the scale well?
I want to how to make cam params converget better? is there any tricks in training? thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: