You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Folks using Carvel's kapp-controller will be able to install Harbor as an independent Carvel package if we wrap the existing helm chart into a Carvel package and publish it.
Users who do not use Carvel today might find benefits as well,
Carvel prevents drifting of configuration - it reconciles to ensure that desired state is maintained.
It would allow users to define PackageInstallations declaratively, thus allowing them to set up[ Harbor on their cluster in a GitOps-ey fashion
A Carvel package can be easily moved into an air-gapped environment
If we automate the process of releasing a Carvel package (with the existing Helm chart bundled inside it) as a part of the release process it will require minimal or maintenance!
What would be the next steps if we move forward with this?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Folks using Carvel's
kapp-controller
will be able to install Harbor as an independent Carvel package if we wrap the existing helm chart into a Carvel package and publish it.Users who do not use Carvel today might find benefits as well,
If we automate the process of releasing a Carvel package (with the existing Helm chart bundled inside it) as a part of the release process it will require minimal or maintenance!
What would be the next steps if we move forward with this?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions