You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've encountered an issue with lf where all files are displayed in white color (EXEC 0 is used). When I use ls, the file color is dependent on its extension (whether it's executable or not), which is the behavior I want in lf as well. However, lf doesn't seem to respect this, and all files are rendered in white.
I tried setting ex 0 in ~/.config/lf/colors, but that didn't seem to help. Is there any way to prioritize file extension-based color settings over executable-based color settings in lf?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I've encountered an issue with
lf
where all files are displayed in white color (EXEC 0
is used). When I usels
, the file color is dependent on its extension (whether it's executable or not), which is the behavior I want inlf
as well. However,lf
doesn't seem to respect this, and all files are rendered in white.I tried setting
ex 0
in~/.config/lf/colors
, but that didn't seem to help. Is there any way to prioritize file extension-based color settings over executable-based color settings inlf
?Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions