forked from digitalmoleculardesign/bill_goddard_chem_120
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy pathchap09-removed.tex
76 lines (58 loc) · 3.36 KB
/
chap09-removed.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
\bigskip
\noindent{{\bf 9.5 References}}
\item {1.} L. Pauling, in Nature of the Chemical Bond, Cornell
University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1960, Third Edition.
\item {2.} Geometry and bond energy from JANAF, 1964.
\item {3.} NBS Technical Note 270-3.
\item {4.} R. Hultgren, P. D. Desai, D. T. Hawkins, M. Gleiser, K. K. Kelley,
and D. D. Wagman, in Selected Values of the Thermodynamic Properties
of the Elements, American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1973.
\item {5.} W. P. Pearson, in Handbook of Lattice Spacings and Structure
of Metals, Pergamon Press, New York, 1968.
\item {6.} (a) J. Donohue, in The Structure of the Elements, Wiley, New
York, 1974. (b) A. F. Wells, in Structural and Inorganic Chemistry,
Pergamon Press, New York, 1975.
\item {7.} I. Barin and O. Knacke, in Thermochemical Properties of Inorganic
Substances, Springer, 1973.
\item {8.} JANAF.
\item {9.} (a) LB II/7. (b) JPCRD.
\item {10.} Klemperer, et al.
\bigskip
\noindent{{\bf 9.6 Exercises}}
\item {1.} The original Pauling scale of electronegativities was
developed when there were little experimental data. (a) Using (6) and Table
9-3, rederive the electronegativities. (b) Using (9) and Table 9-6,
rederive the electronegativities. (c) The results of (a) and (b) may not
agree. If not, consider re-defining either (8) or (9), or both, so as to
get consistent results. (d) What suggestions can you make about the
relation (11) and electronegativity.
\item {2.} A number of compounds have composition XYO$_3$, where Y has
a formal charge of +4. Assuming that Y is octahedral, consider the
various possible coordinations of X, 1 through 12, and determine which
leads to electrostatic balance, assume all O are equivalent. The
structure of perovskite, CaTiO$_3$, which is shared by a number of
minerals has six cations coordinated to each oxygen, including
SrRiO$_3$, SrFeO$_3$, BaTiO3, KTaO$_3$, NaTaO$_3$, KNb0$_3$, PbTiO$_3$,
and many others. Given this information, try to construct the
structure, without looking it up. Use BaTiO$_3$ as the prototype. This is an
interesting case because, below 380$^{\circ}$K it transforms to a lower
symmetry involving a concerted motion of the Ti in the $z$
direction. This leads to a net polarization, or dipole moment, in
the $z$ direction and hence a macroscopic electric field. Such materials
are called ferroelectrics and are useful as nonlinear optical materials.
\item { } Answer: Since Ti is octahedral, we have S$_{Ti} = 2/3$. Consider
the various coordinations of Ba, calculate S$_{Ba}$ and then determine the
number of Ti, N$_{Ti}$, and Ba, N$_{Ba}$ about each O. Since we assume that
every O is equivalent, then both N$_{Ti}$ and N$_{Ba}$ must be
nonzero, leading to the possibilities in Table 9-21.
\item {3.} A number of compounds have composition X$_1$Y$_2$O$_4$, where Y
is nominally Y$^{3+}$. Assuming that Y is octahedral, consider the various
coordinations for X = 4, 6, 8, 12, and for each case determine how many X
and Y must be coordinated to the O for electrostatic balance. Assume all
O are equivalent. If more than one choice is possible, choose the one
with the fewest metals around each O. The spinel structure, e.g.,
MgAl$_2$O$_4$ has four cations coordinated to each O. What is the
coordination of each Mg? See if you can construct the spinel
structure without looking it up.
\vfill\eject
\baselineskip=14pt