Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[question] How to improve guac discoverability on GitHub? #2426

Open
RingoDev opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

[question] How to improve guac discoverability on GitHub? #2426

RingoDev opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@RingoDev
Copy link

RingoDev commented Jan 9, 2025

Question

I recently did a broad search over GitHub for tooling related to SBOM and VEX and guac did not come up at all. I only found it after crossferences of other OS projects. As Guac seems to be me as a great project putting value into SBOMs, I'd suggest improving discoverability with mentioning SBOMs in the Readme or as a "topic".

Labeled as a question as to not really being a "feature" request.

@RingoDev RingoDev added the question Further information is requested label Jan 9, 2025
@pxp928
Copy link
Collaborator

pxp928 commented Jan 9, 2025

ah thanks for pointing that out @RingoDev! @funnelfiasco is there ways we can improve this for the project? I added some more topics but is there more that can be done?

@funnelfiasco
Copy link
Contributor

@pxp928 you can assign this to me and I'll look into it.

@RingoDev
Copy link
Author

RingoDev commented Jan 9, 2025

Maybe adding it to https://github.com/awesomeSBOM/awesome-sbom also makes sense

@robert-cronin
Copy link
Collaborator

Maybe adding it to https://github.com/awesomeSBOM/awesome-sbom also makes sense

would it also make sense to add it to https://github.com/sbilly/awesome-security?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants