You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm getting times ~15 seconds per band structure, which seems a little slow for what this is. Perhaps worth making heavier use of numpy for this.
Would also recommend an additional variant citing the recent Shapera and Schleife (DOI: 10.1002/adts.201800075) which has optimized values for n_vb and n_cb kwargs -- the defaults of n_vb=1 and n_cb=1 are not ideal for general use.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
N_e = sum of s and p valence electrons per formula unit of the material. I imagine the best is we do sum of s and p valence electrons per unit cell in the band structure calculation (bs.structure).
Probably the way to get sum of s and p valence electrons is to call "full_electronic_structure" on an element and subtract the "full_electronic_structure" of the corresponding noble gas. One way to get the noble gas is to call the regular "electronic_structure" method on the Element and do a regex
I'm getting times ~15 seconds per band structure, which seems a little slow for what this is. Perhaps worth making heavier use of numpy for this.
Would also recommend an additional variant citing the recent Shapera and Schleife (DOI: 10.1002/adts.201800075) which has optimized values for
n_vb
andn_cb
kwargs -- the defaults of n_vb=1 and n_cb=1 are not ideal for general use.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: