You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When referencing the help for A, it also includes a spurious link to the help for a-backtick in motion.txt
To Reproduce
Invoke the help-bot with backtick, colon, "help", space, capital A, backtick (spelled out to ensure it's conveyed properly, but should look like :help A
Expected behavior
The help-bot replies with just the link to the help for A (not help for a-backtick)
Screenshots
While not a screenshot, here's the Reddit thread in which it happened:
My guess is that something in the closing-backtick gets interpreted as also issuing
:help a`
While in here, the emitted (wrong) entry seems to mis-escape the closing backtick (precisely what I was concerned about in my opening description 😂) getting the backtick displayed outside the <code> markup.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's probably because of this regex which extracts tags not enclosed within backticks. Apparently it also consumes the backtick. Seems like it has been doing this for a while, but you're the first person to give it a tag where a version with backticks also exists 😂.
Glad I can poke at weird edge-cases for you 😁 I suspect the same issue might possibly manifest for i/I where there's also a backtick version of it in text-object help.
Describe the bug
When referencing the help for
A
, it also includes a spurious link to the help for a-backtick inmotion.txt
To Reproduce
Invoke the help-bot with backtick, colon, "help", space, capital A, backtick (spelled out to ensure it's conveyed properly, but should look like
:help A
Expected behavior
The help-bot replies with just the link to the help for
A
(not help for a-backtick)Screenshots
While not a screenshot, here's the Reddit thread in which it happened:
https://www.reddit.com/r/vim/comments/1hmlgx0/is_there_a_way_to_move_my_cursor_right_on_a/m3v8vi2/?context=3
My guess is that something in the closing-backtick gets interpreted as also issuing
While in here, the emitted (wrong) entry seems to mis-escape the closing backtick (precisely what I was concerned about in my opening description 😂) getting the backtick displayed outside the
<code>
markup.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: