You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I experimented with these. They're quite nice, but the coverage is very limited. I think their goal was more "have beautiful labels at low zooms", and mine is "have beautiful labels at z12"
They have a released .geojson file, it's 11 MB and has 14K features. The features don't have names, and the OSM IDs are a bit weird, eg: some are negative (encoding ways vs relations maybe?), some are fractional
a Python script, it does the heavy lifting in osm-lakelines -- we could have Tilemaker do an export, then use this and import the resulting thing as a geojson file
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't currently label lakes. We could label them as point features, or as center lines.
Center lines are visually appealing, and IMO, reduce clutter by using space that is guaranteed not to conflict with other labels.
Sources of center lines:
Daylight Maps's 1,905 lines: https://daylightmap.org/2023/03/20/water-labels.html
https://github.com/openmaptiles/osm-lakelines
https://github.com/ungarj/label_centerlines
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: