Replies: 1 comment
-
Cpanfile examples: Vulnerable:
Safe:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Dependency confusion vulnerabilities have been identified across various ecosystems like PyPI, RubyGems, and NPM. This type of attack leverages misconfigurations or mixing of public and private module repositories to execute malicious code. The Perl ecosystem, due to its use of CPAN (Comprehensive Perl Archive Network) alongside private repositories like DarkPAN, is not immune to these risks.
The document "CPAN Dependency Confusion" highlights the specific challenges and scenarios in which dependency confusion can occur in Perl. These include:
Public modules overriding expected private/local versions due to higher version numbers.
Misconfigured CPAN clients prioritizing public repositories.
Namespace pollution or misuse of non-reserved namespaces.
To mitigate these risks and enhance ZARN's detection capabilities, we propose adding a rule to detect dependency confusion vulnerabilities.
Proposed Implementation:
Perform Static Analysis of cpanfile
ZARN should analyze cpanfile content to detect patterns and practices that could lead to dependency confusion. This includes:
Namespace Safety:
Version Control:
Source Specification:
Dependency Overrides:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions