Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
|
Being able to run INAV on the Pico 2 would be cool. It would be nifty. Porting it would be a big job, though. One would of course need to add all of sensors, a low-noise power supply circuit, etc to build a flight controller. So from a practical perspective it would be a lot of effort in order to achieve something that's less usable than an existing $20 flight controller. This probably isn't a project that any of the core INAV devs are likely to take up. If @akhodeir or someone else wants to give it a shot, we can help answer questions about INAV that come up. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Surely an interesting Project but I agree, nothing for the main INAV Repo/Code. I will move this to discussion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
@sensei-hacker , can you tell me what is required for the porting process so I can evalute the effort and time from my side? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
The easier part would be similar to adding another STM32 target. See any of the targets in the src/main/target/ to see what that entails. Also in target/ you'll find the main files for the different STM32F* processors - the STM32F11, the STM32F22, etc. That would need to be done for the RP2350. Then you would probably need to implement function stubs which present uart, PWM, I2C, and SPI in the same way that the STM HAL does. This is just off the top of my head. Since I haven't done it, I can't say for sure what all would be involved. See also |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Current Behavior
No support of Raspberry Pi Pico boards.
Desired Behavior
Support of RP2350
Suggested Solution
Raspberry PI announced RP2350 which is more powerful than RP2040
it has:
Who does this impact? Who is this for?
it is much cheaper than equivalent STM32 microcontrollers and more available.
Additional context
Reference : https://www.raspberrypi.com/products/rp2350/
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions