-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Musepack Framing Definition #89
Comments
I think we should put it. But need to define the mapping in order to put it in Matroska. I think the StreamHeader would go in The The |
Any particular reason you assigned me to this? I've never looked into MusePack, and I'm not particular interested in looking into it at the moment. I'll gladly review a proposal for a spec if someone else writes one, though. |
Because you know a lot more about codec mapping than me.
Le 5 févr. 2017 20:32, "Moritz Bunkus" <[email protected]> a écrit :
Any particular reason you assigned me to this? I've never looked into
MusePack, and I'm not particular interested in looking into it at the
moment. I'll gladly review a proposal for a spec if someone else writes
one, though.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#89 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAoJNR8btF1URi9Xt2Wf5-bNzyb_ILq_ks5rZiPVgaJpZM4Lu3to>
.
|
Also I thought it was more like request for comments than assign a task.
Le 5 févr. 2017 22:01, "Steve Lhomme" <[email protected]> a écrit :
… Because you know a lot more about codec mapping than me.
Le 5 févr. 2017 20:32, "Moritz Bunkus" ***@***.***> a
écrit :
Any particular reason you assigned me to this? I've never looked into
MusePack, and I'm not particular interested in looking into it at the
moment. I'll gladly review a proposal for a spec if someone else writes
one, though.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#89 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAoJNR8btF1URi9Xt2Wf5-bNzyb_ILq_ks5rZiPVgaJpZM4Lu3to>
.
|
The mapping is not defined yet and not files (should) exist with A_MPC. We can create the proper mapping for Matroska v5. Ref. ietf-wg-cellar#89
The mapping is not defined yet and not files (should) exist with A_MPC. We can create the proper mapping for Matroska v5. Ref. #89
As of 2009, the SV8 specification seems to be complete; can the Mastroka framing for it be defined now? Please advise, thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: