Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[FA] Investigate performance differences between advanced and default paths #3286

Open
whitneywhtsang opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

[FA] Investigate performance differences between advanced and default paths #3286

whitneywhtsang opened this issue Jan 27, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
umbrella

Comments

@whitneywhtsang
Copy link
Contributor

whitneywhtsang commented Jan 27, 2025 •
edited
Loading

One of the differences between advanced and default paths is that advanced path enabled fast math.
Without fast math, the current geomean of default path is 99.58% of advanced path.
The table below shows the performance of both of them with fast math disabled.
Image
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
umbrella
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@whitneywhtsang