You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm unclear as to how I could leverage model code within my application that relies on the existence of an application scope. For example, in member.cfc:
Since there is no application scope inside the listener code for a websocket, I cannot make this call (not to mention the mapping I typically use):
var member = createObject("common.cfc.member").init(userID);
Currently the way I got my websockets working is to replicate queries/logic that exist in my model layer. Understanding that this is not currently supported, would it be possible to create a page context for websockets so that you could access your application the same way as all your other code?
I know that we've spoken about this in the past, but would like to get a more clear understanding of what makes this impossible (if it is), or what impacts the choice to not implement it this way.
And if this is not possible, I would like to better understand what code changes I would need to make in order to gain access to model code that relies on the application scope, or how to remove dependencies on the application scope.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm unclear as to how I could leverage model code within my application that relies on the existence of an application scope. For example, in
member.cfc
:Since there is no application scope inside the listener code for a websocket, I cannot make this call (not to mention the mapping I typically use):
Currently the way I got my websockets working is to replicate queries/logic that exist in my model layer. Understanding that this is not currently supported, would it be possible to create a page context for websockets so that you could access your application the same way as all your other code?
I know that we've spoken about this in the past, but would like to get a more clear understanding of what makes this impossible (if it is), or what impacts the choice to not implement it this way.
And if this is not possible, I would like to better understand what code changes I would need to make in order to gain access to model code that relies on the application scope, or how to remove dependencies on the application scope.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: