Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

o_ucd discussion #33

Open
Bonnarel opened this issue Sep 28, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

o_ucd discussion #33

Bonnarel opened this issue Sep 28, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@Bonnarel
Copy link
Collaborator

Bonnarel commented Sep 28, 2023

Current text (September 28th) reads :

In the current UCD vocabulary (UCD1+ controlled vocabulary - Updated List of Terms Version 1.5) there appear to be no primary words suitable to describe raw SD data. o_ucd=phot.flux.density does not seem appropriate, since the single dish measured quantity is expressed in raw counts coming from the digitisation of a voltage signal generated in the receiver chain by the incoming electromagnetic field. Further discussion on o_ucd is ongoing within the Semantics WG.

I wonder if we should not say a word of calibrated data. o_ucd = phot.flux.density is valid in that case. Hopefully the new o_ucd term should be introduced before this extension text becomes a PR. The text above cannot stay "as is" in the specification

@BaptisteCecconi
Copy link
Contributor

This has been discussed by the UCD group earlier today, and the proposal is to introduce a new UCD for voltage:

UCD = phys.voltage
Definition = Electric potential difference over a distance or measured by an instrument.

In the case proposed in the text, the example would have the UCD phys.voltage;instr.det;stat.uncalib

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants