Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug] MKV Performance-Bug #236

Open
the-hotmann opened this issue Jan 12, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

[Bug] MKV Performance-Bug #236

the-hotmann opened this issue Jan 12, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@the-hotmann
Copy link

the-hotmann commented Jan 12, 2025

Current Behavior

I have used MakeMKV for quite a while in the dockerized version, but now since two versions, between:

  • v24.11.1
    and
  • v24.07.1

so since v24.11.1 there is a hefty performance bug, when you want to re-mux .mkv files (4K, DV & HDR) and want to process them.
As soon as I switch back to version v24.07.1 all these performance problems are gone and throughput is again up at about 600MB/s.

Screenshot 2025-01-11 110712

Expected Behavior

No response

Steps To Reproduce

No response

Environment

  • OS: Debian Testing
  • OS version: 12.9
  • CPU: 12 vCPU
  • Docker version: 27.4.1
  • Device model:
  • Browser/OS:

Container creation

  makemkv:
    image: jlesage/makemkv
    container_name: makemkv
    hostname: makemkv
    environment:
      - USER_ID=1000
      - GROUP_ID=33
      - LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
      - APP_NAME=MakeMKV
    volumes:
      - "/var/docker/config/MakeMKV:/config:rw"
      - "/path_to_storage/:/storage/:rw"
      - "/path_to_output/:/output/:rw"
    deploy:
      resources:
        limits:
          memory: 4G
    restart: unless-stopped

Container log

Nothing unordinary was logged.

Container inspect

No response

Anything else?

No response

@jlesage
Copy link
Owner

jlesage commented Feb 10, 2025

Do you see a change in CPU usage ?

@jlesage
Copy link
Owner

jlesage commented Feb 14, 2025

This is a problem introduced with MakeMKV 1.17.8.

See:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants