-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SDMMC performance issues #214
Comments
More info: LittleFS vs FATFS on spi flash:
spi flash's configuration is QIO 120 Mhz. |
That's an excellent datapoint, and about the performance difference when compared to FAT that I would expect. This strongly indicates that it's an sdmmc specific issue, probably related to read/write sizes. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Created a seperated issue from #211 .
In short, esp_littlefs's sdmmc speed is pretty slow, and from my simple test the sequential writing speed at 40Mhz 4 line sdmmc mode is 48 KiB/s.
In conparison, FatFS's sequential writing speed is 13.76 MiB/s, hundreds of times of esp_littlefs's speed.
I do all these tests on a U3 (UHS Speed Class 3) SD Card so it's unlikely to be the bottleneck, the ASSSD Benchmark score is shown below:
LittleFS's configuration:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: