-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support reporting on user-defined areas of interest (non-rectangular) #71
Comments
I came here to say the same thing :) Support for a .geojson to define the area would be great. |
Thanks @bgirardot yes we will certainly do that - I can't give you an exact timeline as mostly we are working on this in our 20% 'hack for fun time'. |
Oh nice, it is a very cool tool. |
@TylerRadford We have been investigating this a bit here. I think the hand drawn boundary option might be tricky since overpass does not let you pass artibitrary geometries to ringfence queries - only bounding boxes or a reference to an existing admin area. We can dig in this some more to see if we have made any mis-interpretations of the data, but for now we propose to approach it by letting the user create named areas which can consist of 1 or more admin areas. |
Thanks Tim. So I guess Tasking Manager project regions are out as well
unless they align with an osm boundary. Osm boundary would be a helpful
start.
…On Mar 30, 2017 2:40 PM, "Tim Sutton" ***@***.***> wrote:
@TylerRadford <https://github.com/TylerRadford> We have been
investigating this a bit here. I think the hand drawn boundary option might
be tricky since overpass does not let you pass artibitrary geometries to
ringfence queries - only bounding boxes or a reference to an existing admin
area. We can dig in this some more to see if we have made any
mis-interpretations of the data, but for now we propose to approach it by
letting the user create named areas which can consist of 1 or more admin
areas.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#71 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJZbz6wobUhRm7ziq747eOWDEs23DoYQks5rq6KhgaJpZM4G8bFo>
.
|
Bounding box would be more useful than an OSM boundary. Support for both would be great, but we rarely are running projects based on admin boundaries. |
Hum, it seems overpass has now an irregular option: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Language_Guide#Select_region_by_polygon A triangle over Swellendam : http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/nUC I don't know how big can be the polygon. |
@bgirardot and @TylerRadford ok seems like @Gustry might have found a way to do it...lets see if it works for more complex queries... |
@bgirardot and @TylerRadford sorry it is taking me a bit longer than expected - what do you think about basing the query on HOT projects like this: I still need to wire up the logic for doing that. I will update the select widget for projects so that you can filter as you type to find the one you want. |
Tim that will be great although for some large efforts like the one we have
underway for Malaria elimination in Zimbabwe, Zambia etc. there are huge #s
of projects created - somewhere between 300-500 projects. We ideally need
to go "bigger" than an individual project. @bgirardot could provide more
details
*Tyler Radford*
Executive Director
[email protected]
@TylerSRadford
*Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team*
*Using OpenStreetMap for Humanitarian Response & Economic Development*
web <http://hotosm.org/> | twitter <https://twitter.com/hotosm> | facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/hotosm> | donate <http://donate.hotosm.org/>
…On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Tim Sutton ***@***.***> wrote:
@bgirardot <https://github.com/bgirardot> and @TylerRadford
<https://github.com/TylerRadford> sorry it is taking me a bit longer than
expected - what do you think about basing the query on HOT projects like
this:
[image: qgis]
<https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/178003/24841265/dd180902-1d80-11e7-9b44-edbda40a7dcd.gif>
I still need to wire up the logic for doing that. I will update the select
widget for projects so that you can filter as you type to find the one you
want.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#71 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJZbz8WPMjSWXstxh79UYEhWF7NpmtbQks5ruVVqgaJpZM4G8bFo>
.
|
@TylerRadford Yeah I was planning to support three ways of selecting an area:
In time we could add more to suite other use cases |
Fantastic
*Tyler Radford*
Executive Director
[email protected]
@TylerSRadford
*Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team*
*Using OpenStreetMap for Humanitarian Response & Economic Development*
web <http://hotosm.org/> | twitter <https://twitter.com/hotosm> | facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/hotosm> | donate <http://donate.hotosm.org/>
…On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Tim Sutton ***@***.***> wrote:
@TylerRadford <https://github.com/TylerRadford> Yeah I was planning to
support three ways of selecting an area:
- HOT Project area
- User digitized area
- User uploaded GeoJSON area
In time we could add more to suite other use cases
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#71 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJZbz4G5PlcLipH7eOka3L7MDok_Xxocks5ru327gaJpZM4G8bFo>
.
|
Would be great if we could report entirely within a single administrative boundary (or two or three). The ability to hand-draw an area of interest would also be a nice to have.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: