Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 28, 2023. It is now read-only.

Analysis of the impact of non-attributable threshold signing on economic stability #211

Open
mhluongo opened this issue Jul 21, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Analysis of the impact of non-attributable threshold signing on economic stability #211

mhluongo opened this issue Jul 21, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
🗣️ discussion Open discussion ⚙️ system-design Up-front system design tbtc
Milestone
Post-mainnet

Comments

@mhluongo
Copy link
Member

What are the trade-offs here in liveness / variance?
@mhluongo mhluongo mentioned this issue Jul 21, 2019
Open
@mhluongo
Copy link
Member Author

mhluongo commented Aug 25, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Looks like we're going to start with n-of-n to prevent griefing subgroup fraud... meaning we'll want much smaller signer sets for the first release, otherwise any significant network outage could hit many deposits.

@prestwich
Copy link
Contributor

Can you explain why n-of-n prevents griefing? it seems like it allows a single person to grief regardless

@liamzebedee liamzebedee added ⚙️ system-design Up-front system design 🗣️ discussion Open discussion labels Aug 27, 2019
@mhluongo
Copy link
Member Author

Sorry, I should've said "to prevent profitable subgroup theft"

@mhluongo mhluongo added the tbtc label Sep 16, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
🗣️ discussion Open discussion ⚙️ system-design Up-front system design tbtc
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Post-mainnet
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@Shadowfiend @mhluongo @liamzebedee @prestwich