-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Aliases #32
Comments
Do you know whether the ambiguity is genuine? If it is, there's nothing you can do (but it should favour a one planet model, sometimes with one period and sometimes with the other period). If it is really just an alias (and this is clear given the data), then this shouldn't happen and I can't figure out why it is happening without more information. |
Thanks for your reply. I am (analytically) sure it is the genuine 1 day alias. In addition, the periodogram of RV residues when subtracting one of the periodicity do not show power excess at the alias periodicity. The posterior distribution of the orbital periods from kima shows both (alias) periodicities at the same time. What additional information do you need? |
I'm also surprised the two planet model is favoured because that means solutions with keplerians at the two periods together fit the data better. There is no 3rd signal in the data? As a 'solution' (a workaround, really) try restricting the prior to periods above 1 day. |
In this situation, kima should not be inferring both frequencies. Is it possible to provide the data? |
Thank you for the support, but sorry, for the moment I can not provide the data |
Can you make a fake dataset that causes the same problem?
…On Wed, 15 Aug 2018, 2:21 AM astudillo-defru, ***@***.***> wrote:
Thank you for the support, but sorry, for the moment I can not provide the
data
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://github.com/j-faria/issue_transfer/issues/6>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABgVOmbeCM0OdOo-awk_WboJbgIVa_lGks5uQtzhgaJpZM4VyiLK>
.
|
Hi,
kima favors a 2 planets model but the posterior distribution of the orbital periods shows that one is the 1-day alias of the other. How can I prevent this?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: