-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Page Format #4
Comments
I think the following format would work as a meld between the two:: Example (although example could also go at the end)
Subnodes
Table
|
Also in relation to this, we should decide on some formatting standards, such as tabs vs spaces/how many we decide to use, spaces before and after comments, and the like. |
I think a tab should equal 2 spaces in the examples, (so use spaces, not tabs) and when referencing nodes, use |
And what do you mean by comments? In-line comments? |
|
Oh. I think comments should be styled before the line, like this:
But that's just me. |
Well that means there can be ambiguity over whether a comment is for the line below or above it. We could separate values like you show there, but for large numbers of values in a row, that could become unwieldy. |
true... then, instead of putting comments before key/value pairs, put the comments on the same line but keep node comments the same, but with new lines after the node, i.e.,
|
Yeah I can do that. |
We need to fix the page formats on some pages. I've already added a "Page Formats" section to the README (you can move it elsewhere if you'd like), so now we have to fix the page formats on existing pages, such as the KEX pages. A list is below; check these off as you complete them.
|
We also need to decide how we are going to arrange the wiki pages. The two competing options are the Example/Explanation format (used in the KopernicusExamples pages) and the Table format (used in several of the core Kopernicus pages).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: