We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I am testing this repo out and I am observing around 2.8K gas overhead (difference between calling logic contract directly vs via proxy).
This is significantly larger than the numbers below reported here https://forum.openzeppelin.com/t/a-more-gas-efficient-upgradeable-proxy-by-not-using-storage/4111
I am wondering if there is something that I did wrong.
My compiler setting:
Solc 0.8.17 via_ir = true optimizer = true optimizer_runs = 2000
Can other users share their overhead number ?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The post is a few years old, its likely that the Ethereum protocol went through some changes that resulted in opcodes being priced differently
Sorry, something went wrong.
makes sense. but can you confirm if the 2.8k number is inline with what you currently observe in your usage ?
No branches or pull requests
I am testing this repo out and I am observing around 2.8K gas overhead (difference between calling logic contract directly vs via proxy).
This is significantly larger than the numbers below reported here https://forum.openzeppelin.com/t/a-more-gas-efficient-upgradeable-proxy-by-not-using-storage/4111
I am wondering if there is something that I did wrong.
My compiler setting:
Can other users share their overhead number ?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: