Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modernise website technology stack #1377

Open
achrinza opened this issue Aug 27, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Modernise website technology stack #1377

achrinza opened this issue Aug 27, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@achrinza
Copy link
Member

achrinza commented Aug 27, 2022

The current loopback.io website stack leverages Jekyll. Although it has, and continues to, meet our needs for hosting a simple website, there are certain issues which makes it unsustainable in the long-term:

  1. Unfamiliarity of Ruby and Jekyll among the maintainers
  2. Slow build times
  3. Inability to use component-based, modern front-end development workflows
  4. Legacy baggage

In alignment with the earlier blog modernisation effort, this issue is to track rewriting the current website in a modern, Node.js-based stack.

Currently, prototyping work is being done with Next.js.

@dhmlau
Copy link
Member

dhmlau commented Nov 5, 2022

I wonder.. since our blog site is using Docusaurus, would we also consider that for this site as well?

@GrooveCS
Copy link

GrooveCS commented Oct 8, 2024

@achrinza

  1. Is this still an issue that we want to address?
  2. If yes, could you let me know if your proposed solution is still valid today, or would you like to modify it?

Please let me know what you think. P-)

@achrinza
Copy link
Member Author

achrinza commented Oct 10, 2024

Hi @GrooveCS! I don't think the discussion has expanded beyond what's stated above.

It's still an valid issue, as I think the LoopBack.io codebase has a lot of baggage from hacks and scripts that pull data from elsewhere.

The main objective is to move away from Ruby Jekyll and onto JS so that it's easier for us to extend in the future.

I initially proposed Nextjs at the time as that's what I was familiar with. However I wonder if using Docusaurus or even Eleventy would be more suitable?

Great thing about Eleventy is the granular control over the output, which means we don't have to adapt our existing documentation structure to fit a model.

Docusaurus uses React under the hood, which may mean access to more comptehensive pipeline tools. But I'm not certain if we need the baggage of a frontnend framework.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: Icebox
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants