default containers: is '_pictures' valid?

[david-maidsafe]

🔗 https://safenetforum.org/t/web-apps-and-access-control/26023/66

I’ve just tested the default private container ‘_documents’ successfully: compare safe://to-do and safe://docs.to-do.
I’ve changed the 2 ‘_public’ instances by ‘_documents’, the appInfo id and name compared to here. I’ve no doubt the other private default containers will work the same way, but here on hub.safedev.org I see container ‘_pictures’ mentioned, which I don’t find in the source code of safe_client_libs. That is something to check @dgeddes: remove _pictures from the website or add to the code?