Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

i have a wrong architecture #409

Open
hcientist opened this issue Feb 6, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

i have a wrong architecture #409

hcientist opened this issue Feb 6, 2020 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@hcientist
Copy link

hcientist commented Feb 6, 2020

For some reason, i'm getting:

<my project directory>/Carthage/Checkouts/MapboxDirections.swift/Sources/MapboxDirections/MBDirections.swift:59:27: error: constant 'chip' used before being initialized
    components.append("(\(chip))")

So I guess somehow my arch falls out of the branches... what must the arch be?!

@1ec5
Copy link
Contributor

1ec5 commented Feb 6, 2020

Fascinating, this code already tests all the architectures supported by Swift 5.2. Which operating system and device model (or simulator) are you running the library on?

@1ec5 1ec5 added the build label Feb 6, 2020
@hcientist
Copy link
Author

I am on MacOS 10.15.3 I used the simulator: iPhone 8 (based on a naive assumption that maybe the simulator itself would run significantly faster than the newer simulator, anyone know if there's any reason to believe this weird hypothesis)

@hcientist
Copy link
Author

Maybe this is also meaningful?

The following build commands failed:

	CompileSwift normal armv7k
	CompileSwiftSources normal arm64_32 com.apple.xcode.tools.swift.compiler
	CompileSwift normal arm64_32
(3 failures)

@hcientist
Copy link
Author

weirdly (?) I don't get a failure if i run carthage differently ¯\(ツ)
carthage update --platform iOS

@1ec5
Copy link
Contributor

1ec5 commented Feb 7, 2020

How had you previously run Carthage?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants