You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I wonder if there is any way to see how the groups in level 1 are connected to level 0 or level 2 (especially for the words). Maybe I miss something. but in the paper (figure 5), it seems that you distinguished groups in the second hierarchical level as solid lines and then showed how words are grouped together in the third hierarchical level, which is indicated in the dotted line. And the graph illustrates the groups in the second level are connected to the groups in the third level.
I wonder how I can figure out such hierarchical relations with your code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I wonder if there is any way to see how the groups in level 1 are connected to level 0 or level 2 (especially for the words). Maybe I miss something. but in the paper (figure 5), it seems that you distinguished groups in the second hierarchical level as solid lines and then showed how words are grouped together in the third hierarchical level, which is indicated in the dotted line. And the graph illustrates the groups in the second level are connected to the groups in the third level.
I wonder how I can figure out such hierarchical relations with your code.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: