You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
did someone take ownership of the work about semantic representation of workflows, that started at the latest PMDco hackathon in November? Mentioning @joergwa@BerndBayerlein@MarkusSchilling as hackathon hosts in a way, and @joergwa@MGlauer as the ones who participated in that development there from the ontology side.
We are currently forming goals in the Workflow-Ontology link subgroup of the PMD Workflows group and it will make sense to know about how this topic progressed or when it will be in the PMD Ontology Playground next time. (The later with an emphasize on the cross-over of both topics, rather than going too deep into the modelling background questions - like the differences between a simulated thing and a real thing. ... I know it's important, but we need to find the right overlap between those two groups and that discussion is not always it :-) )
Also mentioning @joergfunger as the one with currently the most concrete use case for that, to my knowledge.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there,
did someone take ownership of the work about semantic representation of workflows, that started at the latest PMDco hackathon in November? Mentioning @joergwa @BerndBayerlein @MarkusSchilling as hackathon hosts in a way, and @joergwa @MGlauer as the ones who participated in that development there from the ontology side.
We are currently forming goals in the Workflow-Ontology link subgroup of the PMD Workflows group and it will make sense to know about how this topic progressed or when it will be in the PMD Ontology Playground next time. (The later with an emphasize on the cross-over of both topics, rather than going too deep into the modelling background questions - like the differences between a simulated thing and a real thing. ... I know it's important, but we need to find the right overlap between those two groups and that discussion is not always it :-) )
Also mentioning @joergfunger as the one with currently the most concrete use case for that, to my knowledge.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: