You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This analysis is to find out whether using the single-ODE parametrisation of the closed-population SIR leads to a substantial gain/loss in two respects:
(i) Computational: are there differences in running time?
(ii) Statistical: Do we get lower MCSE and higher ESS (n_eff)?
The single ODE implementation is here and the double ODE implementation is here, but we need to make sure EVERYTHING ELSE is the same between implementations to ensure comparability
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This analysis is to find out whether using the single-ODE parametrisation of the closed-population SIR leads to a substantial gain/loss in two respects:
(i) Computational: are there differences in running time?
(ii) Statistical: Do we get lower MCSE and higher ESS (n_eff)?
The single ODE implementation is here and the double ODE implementation is here, but we need to make sure EVERYTHING ELSE is the same between implementations to ensure comparability
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: