You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm curious how the identified weave mode will fall on the new plots now that we measured the physical parameters of the bicycle. But maybe we should include them on the plot in our paper to give more confidence in the model's reliability. If they don't match well, then we have to explain things. It could very easily be that the numerical value of our theoretical gain simply does not match that of the bicycle or that the bicycle tire's contribute too much to the dynamics to ensure a mismatch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm curious how the identified weave mode will fall on the new plots now that we measured the physical parameters of the bicycle. But maybe we should include them on the plot in our paper to give more confidence in the model's reliability. If they don't match well, then we have to explain things. It could very easily be that the numerical value of our theoretical gain simply does not match that of the bicycle or that the bicycle tire's contribute too much to the dynamics to ensure a mismatch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: