Replies: 6 comments 1 reply
-
Assign it to me - I'll get it done. =) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Could you explain what is the difference? E.G. what actual problem does this solve? We generally stick with the upstream libs and advocate merging such changes upstream 'it is more active in development' can mean everything and nothing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
From the library readme:
We use this with all kinds of processor arches, and the way you built up the code request you assume it's a drop in replacement, which it is not. Alone the change from local zone to UTC requires code changes in meshtastic. I am not in favor of doing this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@caveman99 I thought I saw it said something about having backwards compatibility. I'm feeling like a stooge now. I think I'll dig more into this and see what I can do about solving those issues. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Platform
ESP32
Description
I see that there has been more active development on one of it's forks: https://github.com/CDFER/pcf8563-RTC
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions