We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I believe deattaching metaverse/fasts3 from hasGavrial/fasts3 will make it clear that changes should be PR'ed to this repo rather than hasGavrial/fasts3.
I see that a PR was added to hasGavrial/fasts3 which is essentially abandoned.
We can deattach using the github support chatbot.
I believe we want to "Extract" the fork, as then all direct subforks will keep this repo as their parent.
Extract - To move the fork and all its subforks into a new network. This repository becomes the new root.
Here is a screenshot of the github support chatbot.
What do y'all think? I believe a single +1 should be enough of a quorum to go through the the Deattachment/Extraction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
adamryman
rushton
lelandbatey
zaquestion
No branches or pull requests
I believe deattaching metaverse/fasts3 from hasGavrial/fasts3 will make it clear that changes should be PR'ed to this repo rather than hasGavrial/fasts3.
I see that a PR was added to hasGavrial/fasts3 which is essentially abandoned.
We can deattach using the github support chatbot.
I believe we want to "Extract" the fork, as then all direct subforks will keep this repo as their parent.
Here is a screenshot of the github support chatbot.
What do y'all think? I believe a single +1 should be enough of a quorum to go through the the Deattachment/Extraction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: