-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Being able to determine if only json or xml should be handled, instead of both. #2
Comments
@acelaya — The We definitely could potentially allow users to hard-code the type returned, and I agree that this would require a helper that wraps when Are you still interested in working on a patch for this? |
Hey! I had to read again my original text to remember what was I reporting, haha. I'm absolutely open to contribute this if you find it useful. However I have to say that I've been using this as it is for several months with no big issues at all, so it's probably a pretty marginal use case. I wouldn't like to end up adding an unnecessary complexity to a perfectly working library, so I will leave the decision to you guys. If the decision is to go with it, I'll take care of the implementation. |
Hi to all! I join the author. I am also willing to contribute and modify the package and be able to skip your handler. |
I have run into this use case:
My application has a JSON API which is served under the
/rest
path, but also 3 or 4 more routes which are not part of this API context.For the API I use "problem details" for the errors, but I also have some other error handling logic for the other routes.
Because of this, my middleware pipeline looks more or less like this:
With this approach, most of the use cases work as expected, except when a request is performed to a not-found path which starts with
/rest
, proividing a non-JSONAccept
header, but one that matches*+xml
.This usually happens when a request is performed from a browser, in which case the
Accept
has the valuetext/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml
...This is making the
ProblemDetailsNotFoundHandler
to generate an xml response, but I would expect/like it to be skipped and my customNotFoundHandler
(the second one) to be executed instead.Proposal
In order to "solve" this, the first thing that comes to my mind is this approach:
Allowing to dynamically determine which "contexts" should be enabled for the module, as in "JSON only", "XML only" or "both".
I see that currently, the headers that determine if the
ProblemDetailsMiddleware
and theProblemDetailsNotFoundHandler
should act as error handlers, are hardcoded onProblemDetailsResponseFactory::NEGOTIATION_PRIORITIES
.Since the three classes make use of that constant to call a
Negotiator
instance, maybe the whole logic could be wrapped into a helper which is injected in the three of them.This helper could then get the "context" configuration or fallback to "both", keeping current behavior.
Let me know if you think this makes sense, or if you think there's any simpler way to achieve the same result.
In any case, I'm open to contribute a PR with the required changes.
Originally posted by @acelaya at zendframework/zend-problem-details#49
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: