Replies: 1 comment
-
Thanks for writing it up in here! I think it's a really cool idea. It sticks a bit outside what I see the main Gokiburi tool being for now, but I can definitely see this being a small, CI-friendly auxiliary tool for Gokiburi that I will look into. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Following up on reddit discussion.
Not sure if anything else uses coverage report this way, but that's how we setup our build process:
cat cover/cover.tmp.out | grep -v ".pb.go" >> cover/cover.out
)Default go cover html looks, well, bad and doesn't have information about tests themselves. The view
gokiburi
is way more informative. It would be amazing if we can rungokiburi
instead of test/coverage and have a single html file as an output. With packages/tests/coverage details.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions