Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consider arriba visualization #24

Open
anoronh4 opened this issue Mar 21, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

consider arriba visualization #24

anoronh4 opened this issue Mar 21, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@anoronh4
Copy link
Collaborator

singularity image we are using for arriba also contains /usr/local/bin/draw_fusions.R. We might consider to use this script to add a visualization output for fusions that are found by arriba.

@andref1989
Copy link

I have written some code for visualizing the reads from a fusion set reported by arriba if you're interested. It's based on a few R-based packages but it's not quite perfect yet with a lot of room for optimization that I can share if interested.

image

@anoronh4
Copy link
Collaborator Author

anoronh4 commented Mar 28, 2023

thanks for showing this! we discussed visualization recently and made a couple of decisions:

  1. we are thinking that this is a low priority because every analyst will likely want to do their own visualization based on their needs
  2. if we do produce some sort of visualization, it should be based off the merged fusion result rather than from a specific caller.
  3. visualization might be a bit pre-mature because we are still deciding how the final fusions will be merged/presented.

do you think that your code can be easily adapted for different formats of fusion calls? what are the necessary pieces of information to run it?

@andref1989
Copy link

This visualization uses the final merged and/or arriba fusion calls in the same format as it currently exists in the pipeline. It can handle bedpe formats without much difficulty either.

For plotting the fusions as is, I only need the bam file and the list of fusions.

@anoronh4
Copy link
Collaborator Author

anoronh4 commented Apr 4, 2023

This sounds like it would integrate pretty well! I think once we have figured out how final fusions will be merged/presented, that would be a good time to start putting it in. To implement we'd need a) a docker/singularity container with all necessary packages/softwares and b) a copy of the custom script(s) to maintain within the repo. If we could work on having those ready by then that would be awesome!

@andref1989
Copy link

I'll try to put those together!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants