-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can I use pangraph for MAGs? #29
Comments
I think in principle one could pass a set of fasta file, in which every record is a contig. At the moment we don't have an option for fragmented genomes, at the current state Pangraph would interpret every contig as a separate genome. Homologous contigs would still be merged in blocks (provided that they are not too small, or too diverged) but every contig would appear as separate "path" in the graph. |
If i connect all contigs with NNNNs it will output a wholy conplicated graph, wouldn'it? I have dificultiy to imagine thatbyou have many fully complete bacterial genomes . |
Yes this is also an option. If you connect contigs with long stretches of N's then one path would correspond to one set of contigs. This will however introduce spurious edges in the graph (these artificial connections between contigs), but homologous stretches of sequence should still be merged into one block. I haven't tested this yet though. |
I wonder if it is possible to use pangraph for metagenome assembled genomes which are usually highly fragmented.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: