You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Aura Kingdom nifs appear to have some properties that are not yet denoted in the xml.
Solution
Hexabits apparently made a number of changes to the xml (linked and somewhat discussed on niftools/nifskope#187 ), but it still needs to be seen what exactly those changes are and whether they can be integrated into the main fork.
If it is possible, then obviously do that. Here is an example of an Aura Kingdom nif for analysis and testing whether the changes to the xml are sufficient: test.zip
If it is not possible, this issue can at least serve as a place to put down exactly why that can't happen and what the exact differences are.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Candoran2
added a commit
to Candoran2/nifxml
that referenced
this issue
Sep 17, 2023
Problem
Aura Kingdom nifs appear to have some properties that are not yet denoted in the xml.
Solution
Hexabits apparently made a number of changes to the xml (linked and somewhat discussed on niftools/nifskope#187 ), but it still needs to be seen what exactly those changes are and whether they can be integrated into the main fork.
If it is possible, then obviously do that. Here is an example of an Aura Kingdom nif for analysis and testing whether the changes to the xml are sufficient:
test.zip
If it is not possible, this issue can at least serve as a place to put down exactly why that can't happen and what the exact differences are.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: