Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
141 lines (104 loc) · 5.33 KB

kernel-development.md

File metadata and controls

141 lines (104 loc) · 5.33 KB
Raw

OpenBMC kernel development

The OpenBMC project maintains a kernel tree for use by the project. The tree's general development policy is that code must be upstream first. This is a strong requirement, not a hard requirement, and exceptions will be made on a case-by-case basis. If in doubt, start a discussion on the mailing list.

The OpenBMC kernel tree is hosted at https://github.com/openbmc/linux and contains the set of patches that we carry. Ideally there would be no patches carried, as everything should be upstream.

Your code will make it into the OpenBMC tree in these ways, from most to least desirable:

  1. When the OpenBMC kernel moves to a new upstream release
  2. By backporting upstream commits from a newer kernel version to the OpenBMC kernel
  3. Patches included in the OpenBMC tree temporarily

TL;DR

If you require a patch added to the tree, follow these steps:

  1. Submit your patch upstream. It doesn't need to be upstream, but it should be on it's way
  2. Use git format-patch --subject-prefix="PATCH linux dev-4.7" [email protected] [email protected] to create a formatted patch

Developing a new driver

When developing a new driver, your goal is to have the code accepted upstream. The first step should be to check that there is no existing driver for the hardware you wish to support. Check the OpenBMC -dev tree, check upstream, and if you do not find support there ask on the mailing list.

Once you are sure a driver needs to be written, you should develop and test the driver, before sending it upstream to the relevant maintainers. You should feel welcome to cc the OpenBMC list when sending upstream, so other kernel developers can provide input where appropriate. Be sure to follow the (upstream development process)[https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst].

In the past patches underwent 'pre-review' on the OpenBMC mailing list. While this is useful for developers who are not familiar with writing kernel code, it has lead to confusion about the upstreaming process, so now we do all of our development in the community.

Once the driver has been accepted upstream, send the good news to the OpenBMC list with a reference to the upstream tree. This may be Linus' tree, or it might be one of the subsystem maintainers. From there the OpenBMC kernel team can decide how best to include your code in the OpenBMC tree.

Exceptions

There are cases where waiting for upstream acceptance will delay the bring-up of a new system. This should be avoided through careful planning and early development of the features upstream, but where this has not happened we can chose to carry the patches in the OpenBMC tree while the upstream development is ongoing.

Another exception to the upstream first rule is where patches are modifying files that are not upstream. This currently includes the aspeed board file arch/arm/mach-aspeed/aspeed.c, and the device tree source files dts. The board file should go away when we get drivers written for all of the functionality; for now it contains some hacks relating to LPC and early init.

If you find yourself adding to arch/arm/mach-aspeed/aspeed.c, first send an email to the OpenBMC list to get the opinion of the kernel developers. Patches to aspeed.c will be treated with some prejudice as the file will be removed once we have drivers for all of the Aspeed peripherals.

Getting existing code in the tree

The OpenBMC kernel is currently based on the 4.7 series. If there is upstream code you would like backported, send it to the list. Be sure to include the upstream commit SHA in the commit message.

Testing

When modifying the tree we currently test on the following platforms:

  • Palmetto, an OpenPower Power8 box containing an ast2400 with NCSI networking
  • ast2500-evb, the Aspeed dev board with two PHYs
  • Witherspoon, an OpenPower Power9 box containing an ast2500 with NCSI networking
  • qemu-plametto and qemu-romulus

Before submitting patches it is recommended you boot test on at least the Qemu platforms, and whatever hardware you have available.

Tips and Tricks

Some general hints for kernel development

Out-of-tree builds

You can build a kernel out of the yocto environment, by using the initramfs (from a pre-existing yocto build) directly:

make ARCH=arm \
    O=obj \
    CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- \
    CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE=/path/tp/obmc-phosphor-image-palmetto.cpio.gz

(adjust O and CROSS_COMPILE parameters as appropriate).

You'll need to use aspeed_g4_defconfig or aspeed_g5_defconfig as your base kernel configuration.

The cpio can be found in the following yocto output directory:

 build/tmp/deploy/images/palmetto/

Building a uImage

To build a uImage (for example, to netboot):

# build a zImage using the obmc rootfs
make ARCH=arm \
    O=obj \
    CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- \
    CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE=/path/tp/obmc-phosphor-image-palmetto.cpio.gz

# create a combined zImage + DTB image
cat obj/arch/arm/boot/zImage \
    obj/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-opp-palmetto.dtb \
        > obj/aspeed-zimage

# create a uImage
./scripts/mkuboot.sh -A arm -O linux -C none -T kernel \
    -a 0x40008000 -e 0x40008000 -n $USER-`date +%Y%m%d%H%M` \
    -d obj/aspeed-zimage obj/uImage

Note that some systems may have upgraded to a FIT-based u-boot, where the old uImage format is no longer accepted.