-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MachineSets with Node Auto-Provisioning feature #1270
Comments
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
I'm still waiting for some official feedback here. Looks like there are some experimentations around a Karpenter provisioner for Cluster API, which could be the integration point for OpenShift. https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/karpenter-provider-cluster-api /remove-lifecycle stale |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle rotten |
About
Most of the managed Kubernetes services out there currently supports a feature commonly called as "Node Auto-Provisioning (NAP), which allows the Kubernetes to scale the worker nodes using dynamic instance types/size according the resources being requested to the cluster (PodSpecs).
Request
It would be nice to have similar capability on OpenShift Machine API, allowing the administrator to define a range of valid cloud instance type/sizes, and let the controller to choose the best option to accommodate cluster capacity requirements. It could not only provide Just-in-Time Node Provisioning but also Consolidation capabilities, like Karpenter provides.
https://karpenter.sh/docs/concepts/nodepools/
Example
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: