-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
is EDGE milestone or surface? #70
Comments
I can either move "@edge" to Surface (simple) or change the precedence levels(which will create some conflicting rules) or handle it seperately (simple). |
I saw this after it's closed but EDGE is a surface in the schema
Steve
-------- Original Message --------
From: "jayanth" ***@***.***>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 2:33 AM
To: "oracc/pyoracc" ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [oracc/pyoracc] is EDGE milestone or surface? (#70)
I can either move ***@***.***" to Surface (simple) or change the precedence
levels(which will create some conflicting rules).
…
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#70 (comment)
|
That is of course for C-ATF, we can open an issue for the ORACC-ATF rules branch to have edge added to the surfaces list. |
I think in Bob's usage it's pretty restricted, so you could (probably) safely change your ATF in the CDLI corpus.
However, it is needed for fragmentary tablets where you might not know which edge it is.
Steve
…-------- Original Message --------
From: "Émilie Pagé-Perron" ***@***.***>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 4:10 PM
To: "oracc/pyoracc" ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [oracc/pyoracc] is EDGE milestone or surface? (#70)
@stinney to your knowledge, are there instances where @edge is (or should be) used in other cases than in place of bottom/left/right/top? I haven't looked at the 1400 occurrences in detail but all the ones I have checked are @bottom or @left, I thought we would simply correct the ATF?
--
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#70 (comment)
|
I'm not sure that is the appropriate implementation, unless pyoracc has selectable modes for C-ATF and standard ATF. The surface @edge is not wrong in ATF: I can understand you wanting to issue a warning in the CDLI corpora, but other corpora should be able to use it without getting a warning.
All the best,
Steve
…-------- Original Message --------
From: "Émilie Pagé-Perron" ***@***.***>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2018 9:14 PM
To: "oracc/pyoracc" ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [oracc/pyoracc] is EDGE milestone or surface? (#70)
Good point, thank you @stinney.
@jayanthjaiswal let's have @edge as surface but with a warning (not error) ok?
--
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#70 (comment)
|
@stinney yes I agree. Pyoracc has now separate modules for C-ATF and standard ATF so it won't be any issue. Oracc rules will remain as it is. |
There are two different rules corresponding to milestones and surfaces:
However, this will only parse, if EDGE is at the start of the file before any surface due to precedence of surface over milestone.
This will pass:
This will fail:
@raquel-ucl @epageperron
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: