Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about kallisto indexes #435

Open
st4302 opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Question about kallisto indexes #435

st4302 opened this issue Apr 24, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@st4302
Copy link

st4302 commented Apr 24, 2024

Hello,

I was wondering if it is more appropriate to use the v1 standard kallisto index https://github.com/pachterlab/kallisto-transcriptome-indices/releases for bulk RNA seq data compared to an index created by concatenating Mus_musculus.GRCm39.cdna.all.fa.gz Mus_musculus.GRCm39.ncrna.fa.gz and then using kallisto index on that file.

I know the v1 kallisto index was created using kb ref but I am not using kb ref for alignment. The command that I will be using to align will be kallisto quant -i mousecdna_ncrna -o mouse_kallisto/MTKO5 -t 4 --rf-stranded MTKO5_R1_001.fastq.gz MTKO5_R2_001.fastq.gz

I am interesting in lncRNAs for my project.

Thank you

@Yenaled
Copy link
Collaborator

Yenaled commented Apr 25, 2024

You can use the prebuilt indices (they contain lncRNA targets and kb ref uses “kallisto index” under the hood anyway). However, if you use those, make sure you’re using the latest version of kallisto (0.50.1).

@st4302
Copy link
Author

st4302 commented Sep 30, 2024

Is it ok to use the same prebuilt index for data where I only expect to have coding genes?

Thank you

@Yenaled
Copy link
Collaborator

Yenaled commented Sep 30, 2024

Yes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants