-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 145
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
release 4.0.5 to maven central (or another publicly accessible repo) #191
Comments
@paultuckey are you the only maintainer of this repository? Is there anyone else allowed to do releases of new versions? |
sure happy for someone to do it. the only reason I haven't is that I haven't had the time to setup many app servers and run the full test suite over them all. |
@paultuckey i do think it's sensible to setup the release proces anyway for running the full testsuite we could start with a single application server and work our way through. i do think that in a minimal setting being able to release is valuable on it's own. either way extra maintainers ( @wbazant and/or @afeinberg ?) will be required to setup some sort of CI if @paultuckey doesn't have the time. |
Recently 5.x versions have been released which include migration to the However there seem to be a number of changes/fixes that were never released for the If a build/release process is now set up, would it be possible to get a Due to the lack of git tags for 5.x, it's a bit difficult to find appropriate start and end points but the changes up until when the POM was changed to There were a number of changes/fixes subsequent to the POM major version change in 2017 that seem to be relevant to 4.x as well, and perhaps could be cherry-picked. |
Yep, I've now got a release process working ok. If anyone wants to submit a PR backporting changes to 4.x I'm happy to accept it. I can just make a long lived branch for 4.x. |
That would be great (to pick an appropriate I haven't really dug through to understand which of the changes after ffd9159 were intentionally "breaking" as a v5 vs not-necessarily-breaking, as when the POM was initially bumped it didn't seem at the time motivated by a specific breaking change - more forward looking. Of the PRs merged, if it's literally only the |
Yes that is a good commit to use. I think the changes related to releasing will be easy to copy in. The changes around container testing will not, so I'd probably skip those. |
4.0.5 contains a fix for qsappend (issue 116), but it isn't available anywhere. can 4.0.5 be pushed to a public repo?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: