Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug Report: Memory leak in Payara Micro 6.2025.1? #7170

Open
pioneer2k opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 5 comments
Open

Bug Report: Memory leak in Payara Micro 6.2025.1? #7170

pioneer2k opened this issue Jan 28, 2025 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
Status: Abandoned User has not supplied reproducers for bug report, soon to be closed if user doesn’t come back

Comments

@pioneer2k
Copy link

Brief Summary

We have used almost all versions of Payara Micro of the last years with almost the same setup and we had never any problem. But this time we had to rollback from version 6.2025.1 to 6.2024.12 because the new version is using all the available memory of 4GB after some ours. With the old version our application is using around 1.5GB all the time. Please see the diagrams below.
Does anyone else is experiencing this with 6.2025.1?

Expected Outcome

The diagram shows the memory usage with versions 6.2025.1 and 6.2024.12. Before Jan 23 and after Jan 27 the version 6.2024.12 was running and everything was fine. And between these two dates the version 6.2025.1 was running and the memory usage was increasing all the time until we restarted our services. The expectation is that version 6.2025.1 behaves like all versions before.

Image

Current Outcome

See above unter "expected outcome"

Reproducer

We do not have a reproducer and cannot provide our application

Operating System

Alpine Linux

JDK Version

Zulu JDK 21.0.6 and 21.0.5

Payara Distribution

Payara Micro

@pioneer2k pioneer2k added Status: Open Issue has been triaged by the front-line engineers and is being worked on verification Type: Bug Label issue as a bug defect labels Jan 28, 2025
@artur-mal
Copy link

Please provide a reproducer that demonstrates the memory leak in Payara Micro 6.2025.1
This information is crucial for identifying and fixing the issue effectively.

@artur-mal artur-mal added Status: Pending Waiting on the issue requester to give more details or share a reproducer and removed Status: Open Issue has been triaged by the front-line engineers and is being worked on verification labels Jan 28, 2025
@marcreichman-pfi
Copy link

@pioneer2k I came here because I am suddenly experiencing heap warnings from my application which recently upgraded to 2025.1 as well, the regular server though instead of micro. I cannot share any reproducer at this time but we have a well behaved application which hasn't had any real changes except for this upgrade recently.

@artur-mal In lieu of reproduction code, is there a way to get certain snapshots or heap information which could shed some light?

@pioneer2k
Copy link
Author

That was my hope that others are experiencing somehow the same. I am unfortunately not able to build a reproducer because our application has massive dependencies to external services that will not run in other environments. And a stripped down application may not have the same issues.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed Type: Bug Label issue as a bug defect Status: Pending Waiting on the issue requester to give more details or share a reproducer labels Feb 5, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 5, 2025

Greetings,
It's been more than 5 days since we requested more information or an update from you on the details of this issue. Could you provide an update soon, please?
We're afraid that if we do not receive an update, we'll have to close this issue due to inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Status: Abandoned User has not supplied reproducers for bug report, soon to be closed if user doesn’t come back label Feb 5, 2025
@marcreichman-pfi
Copy link

Just comparing the diff it looks like virtually no actual code has changed, but plenty of dependency updates have come in. This seems like it might be hard to track down.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Abandoned User has not supplied reproducers for bug report, soon to be closed if user doesn’t come back
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants