You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
the only thing I wish there was other than what 7tv has for image processing already is a way to just compile the emote on the website (using your own images for frames).
My reasoning:
most people use/know/are used to gifs
gif is worse than webp in every way except compatibility with some stuff
people dont know they could make their stuff better quality
therefore having a maker on the website would be a good way to introduce the option to people and saves work of having to upload frames to ezgif, make the webp, then upload to the platform
im thinking something similar to ezgif's webp maker but with different processing ofc since it would be our way of processing, and wouldn't have the same limits/flaws that ezgifs webp tools do (such as frame stacking, size limits, weird compression stuff, etc.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Oh also I copied this from the discord forum and I forgot that I was gonna add that I found out photopea has an api. So we could maybe for example for embed photopea into our website or smth with the animation templates I make already loaded in, along with a guide somewhere on the page for how to use it. Idk what the technical side of that is like, but if that's easier we could have that in the meantime.
The purpose of this project would be to make it easy for people to start making emotes/easier to make them in general, so ngl if the photopea stuff can't be done pretty well/seamlessly it's not worth trying. Would be better to just have a resource section/wiki (and possibly forum) which ngl I'd probably want either way.
the only thing I wish there was other than what 7tv has for image processing already is a way to just compile the emote on the website (using your own images for frames).
My reasoning:
im thinking something similar to ezgif's webp maker but with different processing ofc since it would be our way of processing, and wouldn't have the same limits/flaws that ezgifs webp tools do (such as frame stacking, size limits, weird compression stuff, etc.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: