Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lead bind address ends up in the wrong place #161

Open
mfeit-internet2 opened this issue Feb 21, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #162
Open

Lead bind address ends up in the wrong place #161

mfeit-internet2 opened this issue Feb 21, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #162
Assignees

Comments

@mfeit-internet2
Copy link
Member

Wayne Jackson at NASA dropped me a line with a pSConfig file containing the following:

"foo.bar.org": {
      "_meta": {
        "display-name": "Foo"
      },
      "address": "foo.bar.org",
      "lead-bind-address": "1.2.3.4",
      "host": "foo"
    }

He found this in the logs, which has the lead bind address mis-named and in the wrong place for pScheduler to be able to use it:

2025-02-21 19:22:53 INFO guid=... action=create checksum=... lead_url=https://foo.bar.org/pscheduler test_type=throughput task={
    "test": {
        "spec": { ... },
        "type": "throughput"
    },
    "schedule": { ... },
    "reference": {
        "source_lead_bind_address": "1.2.3.4",
        "psconfig": { ... },
    },
    "tools": ["iperf3", "nuttcp"]
}

The parameter should be this, at the same level as test and schedule, for pScheduler to bind to it:

task={
    ...
    "lead-bind": "1.2.3.4",
    "test": { ... },
    ...
}
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Ready in perfSONAR Feb 21, 2025
@sasgit-hub sasgit-hub moved this from Ready to In Progress in perfSONAR Feb 26, 2025
@sasgit-hub sasgit-hub linked a pull request Feb 26, 2025 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants