You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is partial support for wide index records already, and in practice, it won't be needed unless you have really HUGE datasets, but we should implement it anyway. This should be trivial, and will come down to generating a new index from the old, where the new entries are {seqNum:u64, fileOffset:u32} instead of {relative SeqNum:u32, fileOffset:u32}.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is partial support for wide index records already, and in practice, it won't be needed unless you have really HUGE datasets, but we should implement it anyway. This should be trivial, and will come down to generating a new index from the old, where the new entries are
{seqNum:u64, fileOffset:u32}
instead of{relative SeqNum:u32, fileOffset:u32}
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: