You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What is the current behavior and expected behavior?
When signing a transaction with polkadot extension, i get 1010: Invalid Transaction: Transaction has a bas signature
Now the chain has a signed extensions but no additional signed. When debugging in the extension, i don't see any missing data.
From the node itself, i compared correct and incorrect data and the only difference is in the signature (quite obvious I guess)
I tried testing from a test app, signing payload direct and setting up the types / registry and I have the same results. Using the keyring works, using the extension yields the same error.
The script can be found here.
I pointed the function that does not work but the working one can be found.
For reproduction, some test tokens can be given using this faucet and typing /deposit <address>
The initialisation of the API Promise can be found here.
It turns out, the extension even if aware that there is a signedExtension, does not know how to encode it, I had to use injector.metadata.provide(metadata) with the default metadata + the corresponding userExtensions.
My questions are:
Can userExtensions be added automatically ? Did we forget to put it somewhere ?
Since using injector.metadata.provide(metadata) displays a popup everytime, how is it possible to check if, from the extension, the userExtensions are already setup so we won't have to make the request again ?
Thanks for the time !!
TarikGul
added
the
Support
Tracks issues or requests related to troubleshooting, answering questions, and user assistance.
label
Oct 30, 2024
I'm submitting a ...
What is the current behavior and expected behavior?
When signing a transaction with polkadot extension, i get
1010: Invalid Transaction: Transaction has a bas signature
Now the chain has a signed extensions but no additional signed. When debugging in the extension, i don't see any missing data.
From the node itself, i compared correct and incorrect data and the only difference is in the signature (quite obvious I guess)
Working:
AppUncheckedExtrinsic: Signed: 0687ecfe54a6970a799958522f58646c446891535cc54fa5cd0d7c3a8f6ab105 (5CDGXH8Q...), Signature: MultiSignature::Sr25519(7c01d7eb3ed15dbfa674c42555204c620592e9be10527cb2dea4a45bbf313b48e4d9ccd5f88a4f51f8cd2ea95def17d428819b6536fde28f15552dae54fcf98d), RawPayload: SignedPayload(call: RuntimeCall::Balances(Call::transfer_keep_alive { dest: MultiAddress::Id(581fc8e1118518d6073c2800a3e2dadac231e45eb8c73367bc24fb67e429fc4f (5E4FWi7V...)), value: 1000000000000000000 }), extra: (CheckNonZeroSender, CheckSpecVersion, CheckTxVersion, CheckGenesis, CheckMortality(Era::Mortal(64, 49)), CheckNonce(0), CheckWeight, ChargeTransactionPayment<0>, CheckAppId: 0), additional_signed: ((), 9, 1, 0x0692a0b7fa1b54f57f0f1e5c341231f8c56431b1c1ca45d23b94f57e21ff1272, 0xe9b397dc7e6cbbd596588a2562af0cc05d2608d91956218f54d7bbc5542b0ade, (), (), (), ()))
Non working:
AppUncheckedExtrinsic: Signed: 0687ecfe54a6970a799958522f58646c446891535cc54fa5cd0d7c3a8f6ab105 (5CDGXH8Q...), Signature: MultiSignature::Sr25519(620c04627e7195b03ad21f5454830887fcbd6cf0b005bc1f6b7bfab63ca72e3122f3114bf6a5e776f747135818a3b6c8d72cd84be92016fccea993ca4f16e984), RawPayload: SignedPayload(call: RuntimeCall::Balances(Call::transfer_keep_alive { dest: MultiAddress::Id(581fc8e1118518d6073c2800a3e2dadac231e45eb8c73367bc24fb67e429fc4f (5E4FWi7V...)), value: 1000000000000000000 }), extra: (CheckNonZeroSender, CheckSpecVersion, CheckTxVersion, CheckGenesis, CheckMortality(Era::Mortal(64, 55)), CheckNonce(1), CheckWeight, ChargeTransactionPayment<0>, CheckAppId: 0), additional_signed: ((), 9, 1, 0x0692a0b7fa1b54f57f0f1e5c341231f8c56431b1c1ca45d23b94f57e21ff1272, 0x297ea3d04c56ffce1739904318c4bd566afac8fdd49f3baaf92a9a3ae8c53146, (), (), (), ()))
I tried testing from a test app, signing payload direct and setting up the types / registry and I have the same results. Using the keyring works, using the extension yields the same error.
The script can be found here.
I pointed the function that does not work but the working one can be found.
For reproduction, some test tokens can be given using this faucet and typing
/deposit <address>
The initialisation of the API Promise can be found here.
Here's also the corresponding stalled stackexchange post
I was wondering if the chain was too heavily modified or if there is something I did not understand regarding the data that are signed.
Version:
Environment:
Language:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: