Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ENHANCEMENT]Correctly respect M109/M190 arguments #4087

Closed
WereCatf opened this issue Mar 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

[ENHANCEMENT]Correctly respect M109/M190 arguments #4087

WereCatf opened this issue Mar 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement in progress We are working on solving this one

Comments

@WereCatf
Copy link

Currently on the MK2* and MK3* firmware, the gcode M109 behaves as if you were always using the R - argument to set the temperature, ie. it waits for the hotend regardless, whether it is higher or lower than the requested temperature. If using the S - argument, it's supposed to only wait for the hotend, if the temperature is lower than the requested temperature, but proceed immediately, if it's equal higher.

In other words, e.g. M109 S170 behaves the same as if you were using M109 R170.

The Prusa Mini* correctly behaves differently for the two different forms of the argument.

@3d-gussner
Copy link
Collaborator

@WereCatf Thanks for the request but it is already in the queue FW 3.13.0-RC2 see #2060

Please consider to close this issue.

@3d-gussner 3d-gussner added the in progress We are working on solving this one label Mar 15, 2023
@WereCatf
Copy link
Author

@WereCatf Thanks for the request but it is already in the queue FW 3.13.0-RC2 see #2060

Please consider to close this issue.

Ah, my bad!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement in progress We are working on solving this one
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants