You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In your paper, in Appendix A.1, you said that you use 2 GCN layers for the best performance. But when I run your source code, I fine-tune the number of GCN layer parameter, and I see that the number is 1 for the best, with the same your performance reported (P=0.695 R=0.636 F=0.664). For the number of GCN layers is 2, I got (P=0.68 R=0.62 F=0.644). Any mistypes in your Appendix? or what is the number of GCN layers for the best performance? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear @yuhaozhang ,
In your paper, in Appendix A.1, you said that you use 2 GCN layers for the best performance. But when I run your source code, I fine-tune the number of GCN layer parameter, and I see that the number is 1 for the best, with the same your performance reported (P=0.695 R=0.636 F=0.664). For the number of GCN layers is 2, I got (P=0.68 R=0.62 F=0.644). Any mistypes in your Appendix? or what is the number of GCN layers for the best performance? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: